ArticleJournal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR2026
Psychophysical and Psychometric Properties of Visual Analog Scales: An Auditory-Perceptual Study Applied to Hypokinetic Dysarthria.
Article in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeDespite the widespread use of visual analog scales (VASs), their psychophysical and psychometric properties for rating dysarthria remain largely untested. Using a scale whose measurement properties, reliability, and validity are unknown undermines the comparison of findings across studies and clinical contexts. Therefore, we investigated these properties of VAS using samples of hypokinetic dysarthria.
methodThirty-seven nonexperts and three dysarthria experts evaluated 85 speech samples from individuals with Parkinson's disease and healthy controls on overall severity, reduced loudness, articulatory imprecision, short rushes of speech, and monotony. Listeners used VAS and direct magnitude estimation (DME), which is an established ratio-level scale, to complete the ratings. To determine measurement level, we assessed the relationship between VAS and DME; for inter- and intrarater reliability, we calculated intraclass correlation coefficients for both scales, and for criterion validity for both scales, we applied Spearman's correlations to the nonexpert and expert ratings.
resultsVAS ratings showed strong linear relationships with DME for overall severity, reduced loudness, short rushes of speech, and monotony. Inter- and intrarater reliability values were good to excellent for VAS and significantly higher than those for DME. Criterion validity was strong to very strong for both scales across all features. Compared to experts, nonexperts provided significantly higher VAS and DME scores; however, the effect sizes of the between-listeners group differences were small.
conclusionsVAS is a reliable and valid ratio-level scale for assessing prothetic features of hypokinetic dysarthria including overall severity, reduced loudness, and short rushes of speech. For metathetic dimensions such as monotony, a linear relation between VAS and DME does not indicate that the VAS functions as a ratio scale since linearity is expected for both interval- and ratio-scaled judgments. More work is needed to address the feature-specific variations and establish additional psychometric properties of VAS, such as sensitivity and specificity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.