Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42348562›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Psychosocial factors associated with engagement and efficacy of mindfulness intervention in the classroom.

Savannah K H Siew, Junhong Yu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Savannah K H SiewPsychology, School of Social Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1927-3845
Junhong YuPsychology, School of Social Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMindfulness practice has been associated with a range of benefits in the literature. However, intervention effects show substantial person-to-person variability, and the individual differences underlying this variability remain underexamined. Identifying the psychosocial predictors of the practice can increase our understanding of the mechanisms underlying the benefits of mindfulness practice and inform strategies to increase both engagement and efficacy of it. METHODOLOGY: 66 university students in Singapore were recruited if they had completed a course where mindfulness practice was conducted during the lecture. Participants were aged between 18-39 years old (Mage = 22.2 years). They completed an online survey measuring trait mindfulness, personality traits, attachment and conflict styles, intrinsic motivation, grit, and attention control. Outcome variables of engagement and efficacy were self-reported. Multiple linear regression for each independent variable controlled for different course taken and prior mindfulness experience using a multiple comparison corrected confidence interval of 99.8%.

resultsIntrinsic motivation was positively associated with both engagement in mindfulness practice and its usefulness. The observing facet of trait mindfulness, total trait mindfulness and conscientious personality were negatively associated with how difficult participants felt the mindfulness practice was. DISCUSSION: The significant psychosocial and cognitive variables associated with both engagement and efficacy of mindfulness practice from this exploratory study add to our understanding of the type of participants that might be more suited for mindfulness practice in the classroom.

Indexed as

MindfulnessStudentsAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleMotivationPersonalitySingaporeSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID42348562
PMCPMC13298737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.