ArticlePLOS digital health2026
A conceptual agentic AI architecture for MASLD-associated significant fibrosis in primary care.
Article in PLOS digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is highly prevalent yet often underdiagnosed or undertreated in primary care due to asymptomatic early disease, uneven uptake of non‑invasive tests, limited elastography access, competing clinical priorities, and persistent challenges in sustaining lifestyle modification even after risk is recognized. This opinion introduces ATLAS‑Liver (Adaptive Triage and Learning Agent Suite for Liver disease) as a conceptual reference architecture, not a validated system, for how agentic artificial intelligence (AI) could support guideline‑aligned MASLD pathways by integrating risk estimation, explainability, calibration and fairness monitoring, curated guideline retrieval, and clinician‑retained decision authority within routine workflows. ATLAS‑Liver distinguishes between currently feasible components (e.g., probabilistic models using routine EHR data, local explanation layers with appropriate caveats, subgroup calibration checks, and version‑controlled guideline repositories) and aspirational elements such as dynamic retrieval‑augmented guidance, continuous drift surveillance, and automated agent‑level disagreement resolution. The framework is intended to complement established sequential pathways such as FIB‑4 followed by elastography rather than replace them, offering potential value through improved workflow integration, transparency, follow‑through coordination, and equity monitoring. We situate ATLAS‑Liver within emerging work on AI agents in chronic liver disease while emphasizing its primary‑care orientation and governance‑focused design. We outline key implementation considerations as well as patient‑facing needs such as explanation formats, communication preferences, and support for lifestyle adherence. We acknowledge substantial limitations including lack of empirical validation. ATLAS‑Liver is offered as a hypothesis‑generating framework to guide responsible exploration of agentic AI in primary care MASLD pathways.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.