ArticlePloS one2026
Deciphering intercellular communication in the cerebellar external granule layer: Insights into non-classical connections in neural development.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intercellular communication is essential for brain development. While classical modes-paracrine, juxtacrine, and synaptic signaling-are well characterized, emerging evidence suggests that membranous bridges, such as tunneling nanotubes (TNTs), forming de novo between cells and mainly described in vitro, may also contribute. Yet their presence and function in vivo remain unclear, partly due to the difficulty of distinguishing them from other intercellular connections (ICs). Building on connectomic observations in fixed tissue reporting ICs in the external granule layer (EGL) of the developing cerebellum, we examined their nature in postnatal day 7 (P7) mice. Using immunofluorescence, sparse genetic labelling, and live imaging, we distinguished division-independent ICs from cytokinetic bridges (CBs) and intercellular bridges (IBs). CBs were detected in the EGL, whereas IBs were not observed in this region. In addition to CBs, we identified membranous protrusions which appeared to link clonally and non-clonally related cells. The presence of these ICs reinforces previous connectomic evidence in fixed tissue and raises the possibility that they may participate in intercellular communication during cerebellar development. These findings warrant further investigation into a potentially underexplored mode of communication in the developing brain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.