Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42348534›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2026

Efficacy of adjunctive antibiotics compared to non-antibiotic therapies following mechanical debridement for peri-implantitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Caiyun Liu, Hongtao Wang, Yulan Li, Zhilong Huang, Jian Sun, Han Cai

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Caiyun LiuYichang Central People's Hospital, The First College of Clinical Medical Science, Three Gorges University, Yichang, China.
Hongtao WangYichang Central People's Hospital, The First College of Clinical Medical Science, Three Gorges University, Yichang, China.
Yulan LiYichang Central People's Hospital, The First College of Clinical Medical Science, Three Gorges University, Yichang, China.
Zhilong HuangGuangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Jian SunYichang Central People's Hospital, The First College of Clinical Medical Science, Three Gorges University, Yichang, China.
Han CaiRenmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-3232-278X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the efficacy of antibiotic therapy as an adjunct to mechanical debridement in peri-implantitis.

methodPubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and Scopus were searched (inception to 15 January, 2026). Additionally, clinical trials were searched on ClinicalTrials.gov. Meta-analyses were performed to evaluate bone level (BL), bleeding on probing (BOP), probing pocket depth (PPD), clinical attachment level (CAL), modified plaque index (mPLI), plaque score (PS).

resultsTwenty-two RCTs were included. Adjunctive antibiotics with mechanical debridement demonstrated significant advantages in improving PPD (WMD = -0.69; 95% CI: [-1.04, -0.33]; P = 0.0001; heterogeneity:I2 = 91%, P < 0.00001), CAL (WMD = -0.55; 95% CI: [-1.07, -0.04]; P = 0.04; heterogeneity:I2 = 95%, P < 0.00001), PS (WMD = -4.07; 95% CI: [-6.80, -1.33]; P = 0.004; heterogeneity:I2 = 0%, P = 0.94), and BOP (WMD = -12.45; 95% CI: [-24.13, -0.77]; P = 0.04; heterogeneity:I2 = 94%, P < 0.00001). In the subgroup analysis comparing mechanical debridement plus antibiotics versus mechanical debridement alone, statistically significant improvements were observed for CAL (WMD = -0.84; 95% CI: [-1.55, -0.13]; P = 0.02) and PS (WMD = -3.94; 95% CI: [-7.14, -0.74]; P = 0.02), confirming clinical necessity of antibiotics as an adjunct to debridement. In the comparison of local versus systemic antibiotic administration, comparable efficacy in reducing PPD was observed for both local (WMD = -0.68; 95% CI: [-1.14, -0.22]; P = 0.004) and systemic (WMD = -0.70; 95% CI: [-1.25, -0.15]; P = 0.01) routes, with no significant difference between subgroups (P = 0.95, I² = 0%). For PS, local antibiotics (WMD = -6.57; 95% CI: [-11.10, -2.04]; P = 0.004) demonstrated significantly greater improvement compared to systemic antibiotics (WMD = -2.63; 95% CI: [-6.07, 0.80]; P = 0.13).

conclusionAs an adjunct to mechanical debridement, antibiotics may provide modest benefits for peri-implantitis, demonstrating efficacy in improving probing pocket depth, clinical attachment level, plaque score, bleeding on probing, and other parameters related to soft tissue health and plaque control. PROSPERO: CRD420261328879. Available from https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420261328879.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsDebridementPeri-ImplantitisPeriodontal DebridementCombined Modality TherapyHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID42348534
PMCPMC13298766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.