ArticlePloS one2026
Relationships between gene expression variability, expression levels, and Protein-Protein interactions in mouse and yeast.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding how evolution shapes variability in gene expression is complicated by the interdependence of expression levels, expression variability, and evolutionary rates. Metrics that quantify variability independently of expression would help disentangle these relationships. Previously, a metric termed F* was developed using single-cell RNA-seq data from Mus musculus. Here, analyses of single-cell RNA-seq data from M. musculus and Saccharomyces cerevisiae reveal that the relationship between expression levels and variability is more complex than expected, and F* cannot be fully separated from expression level. Comparisons between single-cell and non-single-cell or simulated bulk experiments show that single-cell data exhibit higher apparent variability for most genes, consistent with contributions from both intrinsic and extrinsic sources. Despite this, the negative relationship between protein-protein interaction connectivity and F* is conserved in both organisms and is also detectable in some non-single-cell datasets, indicating it is not unique to single-cell data or variability. Gene ontology analyses show that, in M. musculus across single-cell and non-single-cell datasets, low-F* genes are enriched for translation- and ribosome-associated functions. When single-cell-specific variability is isolated by controlling for non-single-cell contributions, additional enrichment emerges for splicing and spliceosome-associated genes in M. musculus, suggesting that genes encoding spliceosome components in M. musculus may be under selective pressure to maintain unusually low variation relative to both their expression levels and the variability observed in bulk systems. In no analyses are there over-represented GO terms among the S. cerevisiae genes with low F* values.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.