ArticlePLOS digital health2026
A scoping review of barriers and facilitators to implementing tele-mental health solutions for rural, remote and underserved populations in low- and middle-income countries.
Article in PLOS digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The increasing mental health gap in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) represents a significant global public health concern. Access to mental healthcare remains challenging due to stigma, lacking quality treatment options, and skilled workforce shortages. Tele-mental health, which involves remote access to care through information and communications technologies (ICTs) and mobile communication systems, may represent a promising solution. However, most research in this area has been conducted in high-income countries. This scoping review aimed to explore known barriers and facilitators to implementing tele-mental health solutions to populations in remote, rural, and underserved communities in LMICs to inform evidence-based development and implementation of digital interventions and strategies that can improve access to quality and affordable mental healthcare. Studies published between 2010 and 2024 were identified through comprehensive searches across four databases, namely PubMed, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and SpringerLink. Nine studies were included for analysis. Barriers and facilitators were categorised using the Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation = Behaviour (COM-B) model. A narrative synthesis revealed several barriers for patients, primarily related to limited physical and social opportunities, such as lack of mobile devices, unstable or limited internet access, and lack of private space at home. Barriers for mental health providers were predominantly linked to psychological capability, including insufficient knowledge concerning tele-mental health interventions. Time and cost efficiencies were key facilitators for both service users and mental health service providers, which enhanced access to care. Infrastructure development, educational initiatives, and training for providers are essential to create a more equitable tele-mental healthcare system.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.