ArticleJournal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR2026
Maturation of Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials in Response to Tones and Noise During Adolescence and Young Adulthood.
Article in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeComprehension of speech in noise and noise-vocoded speech develops well into adolescence. To further understand the cortical maturation underlying these changes, we (a) compared cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs) to tones and noise in adolescents and young adults and (b) examined if CAEPs predict degraded-speech perception.
methodObligatory CAEPs were passively recorded in response to 1000-Hz pure tones and bandpass noise in 94 normal-hearing participants (aged 10-23 years). Listeners also repeated speech in noise and noise-vocoded sentences.
resultsP1 and N1 latencies shortened with age, whereas N2 latencies lengthened with age. P1 and N2 amplitudes decreased with age, whereas N1 and P2 amplitudes increased with age. The estimated age of maturation differed across the four peaks. Regardless of age, P2 latencies were shorter, N1 and P2 amplitudes were smaller, and N2 amplitudes were greater in response to noise, when compared to tones. Differences in CAEP responses to noise versus tones predicted noise-vocoded speech perception, although the major predictor for both forms of degraded speech was age.
conclusionsConsistent with previous work, CAEPs continued to mature throughout adolescence. Differences in CAEP responses to tones and noise were similar across age, suggesting that adolescents' neural responses were not disproportionately affected by noise. Differences in the neural encoding of tones and noise contributed to the perception of noise-vocoded speech but not of speech in noise, suggesting that different mechanisms underlie the processing of these two types of degradation. These results have implications for understanding auditory cortical development and degraded-speech perception.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.