Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42348470›Full record

ArticleGerontology2026

Emotional Reactivity to Daily Physical Symptoms in Adulthood and Old Age: The Role of Different Facets of Social Support.

Angelica V Hosea, Johanna Drewelies, Emma K Bridger, Sophie Potter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gerontology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Angelica V HoseaSchool of Psychology and Vision Science, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Johanna DreweliesMax Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany.
Emma K BridgerSchool of Psychology and Vision Science, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Sophie PotterDepartment of Psychology, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, UK, s.potter@hw.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRoutine physical symptoms can impact our everyday emotional experiences in adulthood and old age, with evidence of elevated emotional reactivity on days with more symptoms. Social support is known to profoundly influence emotional regulation in the face of challenge. Although different types and sources of support are known to differ in how helpful they are, this has not been tested for emotional reactivity to routine physical symptoms. We therefore examined (1) emotional support received in daily life, (2) perceptions of support from friends, and (3) from family, as moderators of emotional reactivity to routine physical symptoms. We also aimed to extend limited and inconsistent evidence on the moderating role of functional limitations and age.

methodsMultilevel models were applied to the MIDUS 3: Daily Diary Project (2017-2019), wherein 1,021 participants (M

resultsEvidence for the differential role of social support emerged: perceived support from family (but not friends) attenuated emotional reactivity, while emotional reactivity was exacerbated on days when emotional support was received (but only for negative affect). No "spillover" effect indicated that the potentially negative role of received support is short-lived and context-dependent. We found exacerbated emotional reactivity for those with more limitations, but age was unrelated.

conclusionFindings add to the literature on the complex role of social support and functional health for handling the emotional ups and downs of everyday symptom as we age.

Indexed as

Daily healthEmotional/affective reactivityExperience sampling methodSocial support

Identifiers

PMID42348470
PMCPMC13446885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.