ArticleCancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center
Clinical Prediction Models to Guide the Selection of Patients for Colon Capsule Endoscopy Versus Colonoscopy Following FIT-Positive Screening.
Article in Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
IntroductionIncreasing demand for colonoscopy continues to strain healthcare systems worldwide. Colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) offers a minimally invasive alternative, but its adoption is limited by high re-investigation rates. The aim of this study is to develop and evaluate clinical prediction models for selecting faecal immunochemical test (FIT) positive patients most suitable for CCE versus colonoscopy.MethodsWe conducted a secondary analysis of data from CareForColon2015 randomized controlled trial (2020-2022), including individuals aged 50-74 years with a positive FIT. Logistic regression models were developed to predict CCE transit, bowel cleansing, completeness, and colonoscopy indication. Sixty candidate predictors were assessed, including demographics, lifestyle factors, FIT values, medications, perceived stress, and health literacy. Models were validated using repeated random subsampling and evaluated on a 10% hold-out set using the area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve (AUC), Cohen's K, and accuracy. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was performed to assess clinical utility.ResultsCCE achieved complete transit in 92.1% and acceptable bowel cleansing in 71.3% of participants, with 69.6% of investigations deemed complete. Colonoscopy was indicated in 68.0% of cases, based on broad inclusion criteria, and 55.9%, based on more stringent criteria. Models predicting colonoscopy indication showed moderate performance (AUC 0.69-0.71; accuracy 65-67%; Cohen's K 0.28-0.30). DCA indicated positive net benefit for both models within threshold probabilities of 0.5-0.75, supporting their potential to identify FIT-positive patients unlikely to benefit from immediate colonoscopy.ConclusionsClinical prediction models may assist in post-FIT triage between CCE and colonoscopy. DCA suggests potential to reduce unnecessary colonoscopies by identifying low-risk patients suitable for initial CCE. External validation is needed before clinical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.