Trial reportJournal of behavioral addictions2026
A multi-scale, circuit-to-gene signature of approach-bias modification in internet gaming disorder.
Trial report in Journal of behavioral addictions, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Approach-bias modification (ApBM) is a cognitive training intervention with potential therapeutic value for internet gaming disorder (IGD). However, its clinical efficacy and the underlying neural mechanisms remain to be systematically investigated. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of ApBM for IGD and to identify the associated multi-scale neurobiological signatures, from brain connectivity to gene expression. Methods: We conducted a randomized controlled trial involving individuals with IGD assigned to either an ApBM (N = 30) or a control group (N = 27). Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging data were collected pre- and post-intervention. We applied non-negative matrix factorization and a machine learning framework to identify intervention-related functional connectivity patterns. Imaging-transcriptomic analysis was then used to explore the molecular foundations of the identified neural signature. Results: The ApBM intervention led to a reduction in IGD symptoms and craving. A specific functional connectivity pattern, characterized by anti-connectivity between the visual and ventral attention network (VAN), was identified via machine learning as a potential neural marker of the intervention. This pattern's statistical significance under conservative permutation test was (p = 0.06-0.08). It was spatially coupled to genes enriched in neurodevelopmental and synaptic transmission processes. Conclusions: This study provides multi-scale evidence supporting ApBM as an intervention for IGD. The remodeling between vision and the VAN may reflect a mechanism that interrupts the automatic capture of attention by gaming cues, a process regulated by genes associated with neuroplasticity. We propose a circuit-to-gene framework for understanding ApBM in IGD, though the identified neural signature warrants further independent validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.