ArticleAmerican journal of audiology2026
Development and Validation of Modified Basic English Lexicon Sentences for Use With a Pediatric Population.
Article in American journal of audiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis article describes a new sentence corpus developed for use with children 5 years of age and older that is based on the Basic English Lexicon (BEL) sentence corpus and is referred to as the BabyBEL.
methodSentences were constructed using words found in the expressive vocabulary of native English-speaking kindergarten and first-grade children and organized into 20 lists of 20 sentences each. A female talker recorded all sentences, and speech-shaped masking noise was created based on these recordings. First, psychometric properties of each list as a function of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in a cohort of adults were evaluated. Second, speech recognition in noise by list at -2 dB SNR in a cohort of 5- to 7-year-olds was evaluated. Participants had normal hearing and were native speakers of English.
resultsResults indicate some differences between lists. The speech recognition threshold associated with 75% correct in adult data varied by no more than ±0.5 dB for 17 of 20 lists. Percent correct scores for children varied by no more than 3 percentage points for 12 of 20 lists. The pattern of performance across lists was similar for adults and children.
conclusionsThe vocabulary and sentence structure of the BabyBEL sentences are appropriate for use with children as young as 5 years of age. Recordings of the BabyBEL corpus are freely available for download. When designing future experiments, it is important to consider performance patterns both across lists and between groups of child and adult listeners. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.32715975.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.