Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42348240›Full record

SynthesisClinical psychology & psychotherapy

Impulsivity-Related Traits in Eating Disorders With Self-Harm or Suicidal Behaviour: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Maria Gemescu, Cezar Giosan, Ana Maria Olguța Barizi, Carmen-Andreea Petre, Ana-Alecsandra Gușoaie, Elena-Luiza Costache, Ana-Patricia Darabont, Teodora-Maria Neagoe, Rareș-Mihnea Iosifescu

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical psychology & psychotherapy. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Maria GemescuDoctoral School in Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7331-8931
Cezar GiosanDepartment of Psychology and Cognitive Science, University of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1260-6830
Ana Maria Olguța BariziDepartment of Psychology and Cognitive Science, University of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5531-3182
Carmen-Andreea PetreDepartment of Psychology and Cognitive Science, University of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-8748-847X
Ana-Alecsandra GușoaieDepartment of Psychology and Cognitive Science, University of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-8355-9807
Elena-Luiza CostacheDepartment of Psychology and Cognitive Science, University of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-1349-4745
Ana-Patricia DarabontDepartment of Psychology and Cognitive Science, University of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-9594-2286
Teodora-Maria NeagoeDepartment of Psychology and Cognitive Science, University of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-1811-4061
Rareș-Mihnea IosifescuDepartment of Psychology and Cognitive Science, University of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-8924-0886

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough impulsivity is commonly associated with eating disorders (EDs) comorbid with self-harm, no prior reviews have investigated whether ED groups with co-occurring self-harm exhibit increased impulsivity-related traits.

objectiveThis systematic review and meta-analysis synthesized the differences between ED groups with vs. without self-harm/suicidal behaviour, with respect to impulsivity-related domains.

methodFollowing the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, we searched for comparative observational studies using electronic databases, reference lists, personal reference collection and requests sent to authors in the field for unpublished data. We included studies conducted from 1994 onwards that compared clinical ED groups with vs. without self-harm/suicidal behaviour on impulsivity-related domains, as assessed using questionnaires. We used a two-stage screening process conducted by independent reviewers and the Joanna Briggs Institute's tool for risk of bias assessment. Results were synthesized narratively and quantitatively, using separate random-effects meta-analyses for each impulsivity-related domain.

resultsAccording to meta-analytic results, clinical ED groups with self-harm/suicidal behaviour exhibited significantly increased scores on Negative Urgency (k = 10, g = 0.55), Lack of Premeditation (k = 8, g = 0.34), Lack of Perseverance (k = 8, g = 0.20) and Sensation Seeking (k = 8, g = 0.10). Only two studies assessed Positive Urgency, both reporting non-significant differences.

conclusionNegative Urgency emerged as the prime impulsivity-related trait associated with self-harm in ED groups, therefore strengthening the evidence for emotion-driven impulsivity as a transdiagnostic factor of psychopathology. The small number of studies included, considerable heterogeneity and predominance of female samples should be taken into account when interpreting current findings.

Indexed as

Feeding and Eating DisordersImpulsive BehaviorSelf-Injurious BehaviorComorbidityFemaleHumanseating disordersimpulsivitynegative urgencyNSSIself‐harmsuicide

Identifiers

PMID42348240
PMCPMC13297027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.