Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42348233›Full record

ArticleJAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery2026

Dynamic Quality-of-Life Trajectories After Head and Neck Reconstruction.

Steven J Lo, You-Yan Chen, Fu-Chan Wei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Steven J LoCanniesburn Plastic Surgery Unit, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
You-Yan ChenChang Gung University School of Chinese Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Fu-Chan WeiDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Quality of life (QOL) is considered the second most important outcome after survival in cancer care. In head and neck reconstruction, QOL has long been assumed to stabilize at 1 year, an assumption that guides clinical follow-up and trial design. Objective: To evaluate QOL beyond 1 year after head and neck reconstruction. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective cohort study of 315 patients with head and neck disease was conducted from 2015 through 2023 at a high-volume tertiary center in Taiwan. Data were analyzed March to August 2025. Exposure: Free flap reconstruction. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the physical domain of the University of Wisconsin QOL questionnaire. The primary end point was QOL time to deterioration (TTD), which accounts for reversibility and patient response shift, and to identify modifiable risk factors for deterioration, defined in TTD as a decline of 5 or more points without subsequent recovery of 5 or more points. For Cox proportional hazards models, statistical analysis included hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs. The secondary end point was a composite of TTD or death. Results: Among 315 patients (mean [SD] age, 53.7 [11.8] years; 283 [89.8%] male; median follow-up, 1155 [95% CI, 1056 to 1254] days), baseline Cox models identified Charlson Comorbidity Index as associated with QOL deterioration (HR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.22 to 1.74). In 12-month landmark models (N = 272), Charlson Comorbidity Index (HR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.43 to 2.06), chemotherapy (HR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.03 to 2.48), and complications (HR 2.01; 1.21 to 3.34) were associated with QOL deterioration. The composite end point showed similar results. QOL remained dynamic beyond 1 year, with 115 of 192 patients (59.9%) having clinically meaningful score changes between years 1 and 2 (58 of 192 [30.2%] improved, 57 of 192 [29.7%] deteriorated) despite stable cohort mean scores. Findings were consistent in analyses restricted to patients with malignant disease (n = 246). Exploratory baseline and 12-month risk scores demonstrated the feasibility of predicting dynamic QOL changes beyond 1 year. Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this cohort study question the assumption that QOL stabilizes at 1 year after head and neck reconstruction. More than half of patients continued to experience clinically meaningful changes, with complications at 1 year representing the strongest modifiable risk factor for deterioration. Prognostic QOL risk scores provide an approach for targeting survivorship interventions to patients at highest risk for deterioration, shifting the focus from survival alone to preservation of QOL.

Indexed as

Head and Neck NeoplasmsPlastic Surgery ProceduresQuality of LifeFemaleFree Tissue FlapsHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesTaiwan

Identifiers

PMID42348233
PMCPMC13306489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.