Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42348107›Full record

ReviewEmergency radiology2026

CT in adult patients with Polytrauma: current practices, protocol optimization, structured reporting and future directions.

Kirthi Sathyakumar, Vijayan Purushothaman, Joses Dany James, Vignesh Kumar

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Emergency radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kirthi SathyakumarDepartment of Radiology, SRM Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health sciences, SRM Institute of Science and Technology Kattankulathur, Chengalpattu, 603203, Tamil Nadu, India. kirthi86sk@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7742-5328
Vijayan PurushothamanDepartment of Surgery, SRM Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health sciences, SRM Institute of Science and Technology Kattankulathur, Chengalpattu, 603203, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9589-4961
Joses Dany JamesDepartment of Trauma Surgery, Christian Medical College and Hospital, Vellore, 632517, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9162-6452
Vignesh KumarDepartment of Surgery, Pondicherry Institute of Medical Sciences, Puducherry, 605014, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1636-0284

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computed tomography [CT] is the frontline imaging modality for the assessment of polytrauma patients because of its speed, diagnostic accuracy and influence on immediate management. Ever since whole-body CT [WB-CT or "pan-scan"] was adopted, there has been ongoing debate about patient selection, optimal protocols and acquisition strategies, radiation safety, and its integration into streamlined trauma workflows. Evidence suggests that WB-CT shortens time-to-diagnosis and improves injury detection compared with region-specific selective CT, although mortality benefits are variable across studies and the radiation dose remains marginally higher. Newer protocol variants, such as the split-bolus single-pass technique, dual-energy CT [DECT], dose-reduced and hybrid timing strategies, monophasic acquisition in select patients aim to optimize diagnostic accuracy while reducing dose and contrast. Structured reporting using trauma-specific templates improve completeness and diagnostic performance, particularly among less experienced radiologists. Emerging tools such as artificial intelligence [AI] triage/flagging systems, photon-counting and spectral CT, and automated structured reporting can potentially improve the trauma workflow efficiency. This article reviews current guidelines, compares WB-CT with selective CT, discusses existing WB-CT protocols, proposes a practical optimized WB-CT protocol termed - 'IMPACT Protocol [Integrated Multiphase Polytrauma Assessment CT]',and offers recommendations for structured reporting and future implementation.

Indexed as

Multiple TraumaTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultHumansPractice Guidelines as TopicRadiation DosageWhole Body ImagingEmergencyPan CTPolytrauma imagingWhole body computed tomography

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.