ArticleEmergency radiology2026
A case series on ultrasonographic findings in pediatric testicular rupture: a comparison with surgical findings.
Article in Emergency radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePediatric testicular rupture is rare, and detailed descriptions of its ultrasonographic (US) findings with operative correlation remain limited. This paper reviews the characteristic ultrasonographic findings of pediatric testicular rupture and correlates them with operative findings and postoperative outcomes.
methodsAmong 27 male patients who underwent US for suspected testicular trauma over a 23-year period, four cases with surgically confirmed testicular rupture were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical presentation, physical examination findings, timing of presentation and surgery, preoperative US findings, operative findings, and postoperative outcomes were evaluated.
resultsThe patients ranged in age from 11 to 14 years, with two right-sided and two left-sided injuries. Mechanisms of injury included sports-related trauma (n = 2) and physical assault (n = 2). Presenting symptoms included scrotal swelling, scrotal/lower abdominal pain, and vomiting. Physical examination demonstrated scrotal tenderness in all patients, scrotal swelling in three, and erythema in one. The interval from injury to presentation ranged from 2 to 60 h (median, 34 h), and the interval from injury to surgery ranged from 28 to 130 h (median, 54 h). All patients demonstrated characteristic US findings suggestive of testicular rupture, including discontinuity of the tunica albuginea, poorly defined testicular margins, heterogeneous echotexture of the extruded testicular parenchyma, and decreased blood flow in the extruded area. Associated findings included intratesticular or scrotal hematoma and scrotal wall thickening. Operative findings confirmed rupture of the tunica albuginea in all cases and correlated well with preoperative US findings. During follow-up (mean, 9 months), ipsilateral testicular atrophy developed in three patients, whereas one patient showed preserved testicular volume without abnormal US findings.
conclusionPediatric testicular rupture demonstrates characteristic ultrasonographic findings that correlate well with operative findings. Recognition of these findings may facilitate early diagnosis and prompt surgical consultation. Because postoperative testicular atrophy may occur despite testicular preservation, continued ultrasonographic follow-up is important.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42348106What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.