ReviewEmergency radiology2026
Imaging of anorectal and perineal emergencies - a multimodality review.
Review in Emergency radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute anorectal and perineal emergencies encompass a wide spectrum of infectious, inflammatory, traumatic, iatrogenic, and neoplastic conditions that often present with nonspecific symptoms but may rapidly progress to significant morbidity if unrecognized. Imaging plays a central role in diagnosis, assessment of disease extent, detection of complications, and treatment planning because clinical examination frequently underestimates involvement of the complex anorectal and perineal spaces. Computed tomography (CT) is the primary imaging modality in the emergency setting owing to its rapid acquisition and ability to detect abscesses, perforation, hemorrhage, extraluminal gas, and deep pelvic extension, whereas magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides superior soft-tissue characterization for evaluation of fistulas, sphincteric involvement, and complex inflammatory disease. This review provides an overview of the pertinent anorectal and perineal anatomy, imaging evaluation strategies, and characteristic multimodality imaging features of common anorectal and perineal emergencies. Particular emphasis is placed on key imaging findings, including rim-enhancing abscesses and fistulous tracts, soft-tissue gas with fascial extension in necrotizing infections, bowel wall thickening and perirectal inflammatory changes in proctocolitis, and the presence of extraluminal air or fluid collections associated with rectal perforation and retained foreign bodies. The review also highlights the value of a compartment-based approach in accurately delineating disease extent and guiding clinical management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42348105What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.