Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42348095›Full record

SynthesisPhotochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology2026

Community sunbed use and photosensitivity reactions: a systematic review.

James M MacLaurin, Kirsty J Rutter, Lesley E Rhodes

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

James M MacLaurinCentre for Dermatology Research, Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Kirsty J RutterCentre for Dermatology Research, Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8048-7995
Lesley E RhodesCentre for Dermatology Research, Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. lesley.e.rhodes@manchester.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9107-6654

Funding

Manchester Biomedical Research Centre NIHR203308
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sunbeds emitting ultraviolet radiation (UVR) are an established carcinogen, but little attention has been given to the adverse photosensitivity reactions the UVR exposure can cause. We addressed this information gap through systematic review of the literature on photosensitivity reactions reported following community sunbed use. A systematic search of Medline (via PubMed), CINAHL and Embase identified studies published in English (inception to May 2025). The protocol was registered in Prospero (CRD420251048551). We included all study designs. Quality was assessed using JBI Critical Appraisal Checklists (Case-Reports, Case-Series) and Downes Appraisal (Cross-Sectional Studies), and narrative synthesis performed. Of 413 articles screened, 34 met inclusion criteria (26 case-reports, 6 case-series, 2 cross-sectional studies; 28 high quality for their study design). There were 67 photosensitivity reactions, including 33 cases of photodermatoses (29 pseudoporphyria; 4 solar urticaria, 3 as first presentations), and 3 cases of photoaggravated disorders (one first presentation and two exacerbations of known SLE). There were 31 photosensitivity reactions induced by exogenous substances including 11 to systemic drugs (10 skin, one retinal). Phototoxic reactions occurred to celery, parsnip and lime juice (14 via contact, one ingested), and 5 photocontact reactions to other topical agents including a well-being product. Severe systemic reactions occurred, and 6 cases hospitalised. Findings reveal wide-ranging and severe photosensitivity reactions and indicate attention should be given to providing effective information about the risks and triggers of photosensitivity reactions from sunbeds. This includes to sunbed-outlet staff, sunbed-users, patients with disorders that can be UVR-triggered or aggravated, and people taking potentially photosensitising medication.

Indexed as

Photosensitivity DisordersSunbathingUltraviolet RaysHumansDrug-induced photosensitivityLight-sensitivityPhotocontact reactionsPhotodermatosesPhotosensitivitySunbeds

Identifiers

PMID42348095
PMCPMC13476300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.