ReviewDermatology and therapy2026
The Bacterial Landscape of Facial Skin: From Homeostasis to Skin Conditions.
Review in Dermatology and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The human facial skin microbiome is a complex and dynamic ecosystem that plays a central role in maintaining skin health, immune regulation, and preventing dermatological skin conditions. Cutibacterium acnes (C. acnes) and Staphylococcus epidermidis (S. epidermidis) are the most prominent bacterial species, with shifts in their relative abundance correlating with skin site, age, skin site, and health status. Exploring the facial microbiome offers exciting opportunities, though it requires careful methodological consideration. Sampling techniques vary in invasiveness and depth, which can influence the accuracy and reproducibility of microbiome profiles. While traditional cultivation methods provide valuable insights, they often miss nonculturable microbes, limiting the view of microbial diversity. Molecular approaches such as amplicon sequencing and metagenomics enable a more comprehensive understanding of microbial communities, even though they currently cannot distinguish between viable and nonviable microbes. Addressing these challenges will help unlock the full potential of facial microbiome research. A balanced facial skin microbiome is associated with healthy skin, whereas a dysbiosis of C. acnes and S. epidermidis is commonly observed in acne-prone skin and more pronounced clinically manifest acne. A comprehensive understanding of the diversity and distribution of C. acnes phylotypes, as well as distinct lineages of S. epidermidis associated with skin disorders, is crucial for developing targeted, microbiome-based cosmetic and medical treatments. Emerging strategies aim to restore microbial balance by leveraging the skin's native microbiota, including probiotic approaches. These strategies represent a promising yet still emerging approach, as current clinical evidence remains limited and further well-controlled studies are required, although they may offer benefits by enhancing microbial diversity and supporting skin barrier function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.