ArticleClinical and experimental medicine2026
C-reactive protein-to-lymphocyte ratio and stroke: associations with prevalence and subsequent mortality in NHANES 1999-2010.
Article in Clinical and experimental medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early risk detection is critical for timely intervention to reduce stroke morbidity and recurrence rate. This study systematically investigated the association between the CRP-to-lymphocyte ratio (CLR) and stroke prevalence, aiming to evaluate whether CLR may serve as a convenient and readily accessible inflammatory biomarker for stroke prediction. Data were analyzed from the 23,483 participants in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) between 1999 and 2010. Multivariable logistic regression models were employed to assess the relationship between CLR and prevalent stroke. Among 789 individuals with a history of stroke, Cox proportional hazards models were used to examine the association between CLR and all-cause as well as cause-specific mortality. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were constructed to compare survival outcomes across CLR strata defined by an optimal cutoff. Restricted cubic spline (RCS) analysis was applied to explore potential nonlinear relationships. The predictive value of CLR was compared with that of established inflammatory markers using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. After adjusting for potential confounders, elevated CLR is significantly and independently associated with higher odds of stroke prevalence in the fully adjusted model (OR = 1.005, 95% CI: 1.002-1.007, P < 0.001). Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrates significantly higher mortality risks among stroke participants with CLR above the optimal threshold. RCS models showed no evidence of nonlinearity between the CLR and mortality risks. Furthermore, ROC analysis indicated that CLR exhibited superior predictive ability compared to the established inflammation markers, including the Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index (SII), Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR), C-reactive protein (CRP), and lymphocyte counts (all P < 0.05). These findings suggest that CLR is an independent and significant predictor of both the stroke prevalence and all-cause mortality in stroke patients, highlighting its potential utility as a readily accessible inflammatory biomarker for stroke prevalence stratification. Given its ease of derivation from routine examination data, CLR holds promise for broad clinical applicability. Further prospective studies are warranted to elucidate the underlying mechanisms and to validate its predictive value in diverse populations.Trial registration: This study is a secondary analysis of publicly available NHANES data and does not constitute a clinical trial; therefore, trial registration is not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.