Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42348045›Full record

ReviewCurrent treatment options in oncology2026

Advances in Immunotherapy for Breast Cancer: Up-to-date Strategies of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Therapeutic Vaccines.

Salma Martínez-López, Cristina Blasco-Navarro, Sofía Blas-Gómez, Iván Bravo, María Del Mar Noblejas-López

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current treatment options in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Salma Martínez-LópezDepartamento de Química Física, Facultad de Farmacia. Unidad nanoDrug, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Albacete, 02008, Spain.
Cristina Blasco-NavarroDepartamento de Química Física, Facultad de Farmacia. Unidad nanoDrug, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Albacete, 02008, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-7328-6142
Sofía Blas-GómezDepartamento de Química Física, Facultad de Farmacia. Unidad nanoDrug, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Albacete, 02008, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-1231-9252
Iván BravoDepartamento de Química Física, Facultad de Farmacia. Unidad nanoDrug, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Albacete, 02008, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1589-5399
María Del Mar Noblejas-LópezDepartamento de Química Inorgánica, Orgánica y Bioquímica, Facultad de Farmacia-Centro de Innovación en Química Avanzada (ORFEO-CINQA), Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Unidad nanoDrug, Albacete, 02008, Spain. MariadelMar.Noblejas@uclm.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9250-9688

Funding

Agencia Estatal de Investigación 10.13039/50110001103Junta de Comunidades de Castilla-La Mancha SBPLY/21/180501/000050Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación and Agencia Estatal de Investigación CPP2021-008597
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

opinion statementBreast cancer remains one of the leading causes of cancer-related mortality among women worldwide. Although advances in early diagnosis and conventional therapies have significantly improved the prognosis in many cases, certain aggressive subtypes such as triple-negative breast cancer continue to pose major clinical challenges due to the absence of specific therapeutic targets. Therefore, we believe that exploring novel strategies for the development and application of immunotherapy may change the paradigm for this type of tumor. Immunotherapy aims to activate the patient's own immune system to recognize and eliminate tumor cells more effectively and selectively, improving immunological memory. Based on a structured review of scientific literature and therapeutic clinical trials published in the main scientific databases, including studies of different clinical phases and stages of the disease, from early-stage to metastatic breast cancer, we conclude that immune checkpoint inhibitors, especially when combined with chemotherapy and administered to patients with positive biomarkers, such as PD-L1 expression, provide significant clinical benefits. In addition, therapeutic vaccines continue to be studied as a promising approach to preventing relapses in high-risk patients when combined with other immunotherapy agents. This represents a major advance in the treatment of the most aggressive subtypes of breast cancer, positioning immunotherapy as one of the most promising treatments.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCancer VaccinesImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsImmunotherapyBiomarkers, TumorCombined Modality TherapyDisease ManagementFemaleHumansMolecular Targeted TherapyTreatment OutcomeBiomarkers, TumorCancer VaccinesImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsBreast cancerImmune-checkpoint inhibitorsImmunotherapyTherapeutic vaccines

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.