ArticleFood science of animal resources2026
Application of high hydrostatic pressure on the microbial and physicochemical characteristics of pork.
Article in Food science of animal resources, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study investigated the effects of high hydrostatic processing on the microbial safety and physicochemical properties of raw pork. Raw pork samples were treated at pressures of 0.1, 100, 300, and 500 MPa for 5-15 min and stored under refrigerated conditions for up to 2 weeks. Microbial populations, including Bacillus cereus, Escherichia coli, Salmonella Typhimurium, Listeria monocytogenes, and Staphylococcus aureus, were analyzed alongside physicochemical properties such as proximate composition, pH, water-holding capacity (WHC), shear force, thiobarbituric acid reactive substance, and volatile basic nitrogen. Microbial count decreased significantly with increasing pressure and holding time. The 500 MPa for 15 min treatment exhibited the strongest antimicrobial effect, reducing S. Typhimurium and L. monocytogenes to below detectable levels during storage. B. cereus, E. coli, and S. aureus showed substantial reductions, although partial survival was observed in pressure-tolerant microorganisms during storage. Increasing pressure and treatment time led to increases in water-holding capacity, shear force, and pH, while moisture and protein contents increased and fat and ash contents decreased. These physicochemical changes were attributed to pressure-induced denaturation and reorganization of myofibrillar proteins, resulting in a compact protein network. TBARS values increased due to high-pressure-induced membrane damage and the release of ions and free radicals, whereas VBN values were suppressed by microbial inactivation and pressure-induced enzyme modification. Increasing pressure intensity and holding time enhanced both microbial inactivation and physicochemical changes, indicating that high hydrostatic processing exerts combined physical and chemical effects on microorganisms, muscle fibers, myoglobin, and enzymes in raw pork.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.