ArticleFamilial cancer2026
When screentime fails: initiative to improve completion of hereditary cancer genetic testing after telemedicine counseling.
Article in Familial cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Telemedicine has broadened access to genetic counseling while maintaining high levels of patient satisfaction. However, emerging evidence suggests lower completion rates of genetic testing following virtual visits compared with in-person encounters. This study evaluated genetic testing completion rates among patients who underwent cancer risk assessment via telemedicine and assessed the effect of a structured follow-up telephone reminder on genetic testing completion. We conducted a retrospective review of a quality improvement initiative - Genetic Engagement via Navigation and Encouragement (GENE CALL) - designed to address incomplete genetic testing following telemedicine counseling. The study included all patients who underwent virtual cancer risk assessment between September 2023 and July 2024 at a single urban academic cancer genetics program. Patients who expressed interest in genetic testing but had not scheduled specimen collection were contacted by telephone as a reminder. During the call, patients were asked about ongoing interest in testing and barriers to scheduling; they were also offered assistance completing specimen collection. Among 647 patients evaluated via telemedicine, 469 (72.5%) expressed interest in genetic testing. Of these, 290 (61.8%) had scheduled or completed testing, while 179 (38.2%) had not. Among those who had not scheduled testing, 120 (67.0%) were successfully reached by telephone, and 98 (81.7%) confirmed ongoing interest in completing testing. At 3-month follow-up, 48 (40.0%) of the 120 contacted patients had completed testing, compared with 13 (22.0%) of 59 patients who were not reached (p = 0.017). Telephone follow-up is an effective strategy to improve genetic testing completion after virtual counseling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42348011What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.