Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42348001›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of colorectal disease2026

The 'other' colonic polyposis syndromes-evolving insights and guidance for endoscopists.

Amanda Liesegang, Andy Wu, Alexander Heriot, Glen Guerra

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of colorectal disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Amanda LiesegangSir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, 305 Grattan Street, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia. aliesegang@student.unimelb.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3180-383X
Andy WuNorthern Health Service, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Alexander HeriotSir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, 305 Grattan Street, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia.
Glen GuerraSir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, 305 Grattan Street, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePolyposis syndromes contribute to a significant proportion of colorectal cancer (CRC) diagnoses. While Lynch syndrome (LS) and familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) are well characterised, a growing number of rarer polyposis syndromes are increasingly recognised in clinical practice. These conditions often present with overlapping phenotypes and variable penetrance, posing diagnostic and management challenges for the practising clinician. The evidence base remains limited, with current guidance largely derived from small cohort studies and expert opinion. This narrative review summarises the current literature on the genetic basis, clinical manifestations, and endoscopic features of the rarer colorectal polyposis syndromes, excluding LS and FAP.

methodsA comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed and Ovid databases. Selected articles were evaluated for relevance and quality, and key findings were synthesised narratively to provide an overview of current knowledge and emerging trends relating to the rarer polyposis syndromes.

resultsThis review consolidates international recommendations for surveillance and management, with a focus on practical guidance for the endoscopist. Advances in next-generation sequencing and multigene panel testing have reshaped our understanding of polyposis genetics, leading to the identification of several novel autosomal dominant and recessive syndromes. Despite these discoveries, surveillance protocols remain heterogeneous, and gaps persist in defining cancer risk, optimal timing of intervention, and the role of chemoprevention. Greater awareness of these syndromes among clinicians is essential for timely diagnosis and personalised management.

conclusionCollaborative registries, prospective data, and consensus-driven guidelines are urgently required to standardise care and improve outcomes for patients with rare polyposis syndromes.

Indexed as

Adenomatous Polyposis ColiPractice Guidelines as TopicGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansColonic polypsColorectal neoplasiaEndoscopic surveillanceMismatch repair deficiencyPolyposis syndromes

Identifiers

PMID42348001
PMCPMC13553667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.