ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2026
Identification and management of different types of bacillary layer detachment in eyes with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.
Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo describe the preoperative and postoperative features of eyes with fovea-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) and different types of bacillary layer detachment (BALAD), which consists of an intraretinal split within the photoreceptor inner segment myoid zone or formation of a inner lamellar defect at the fovea visible on spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT).
methodsRetrospective cohort study of patients with primary RRD and BALAD who underwent pars plana vitrectomy (PPV). OCT, multicolor images, and logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) best-corrected visual acuities (BCVAs) were obtained preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after the operation. Three types of BALAD were identified preoperatively on the basis of OCT: cavity, transition and lamellar hole.
resultsAmong the 42 eyes included, 23 were classified as cavity, 6 as transition and 13 as lamellar hole BALAD. All types showed a sharp red round area at the fovea on multicolor images. After standard PPV, additional internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling was carried out in none eyes with cavity BALAD, in 2 eyes with transition BALAD and in all BALAD-lamellar hole eyes. Post-operatively, no eyes showed evidence of full-thickness macular hole (FTMH). At 12 months post-operatively, external limiting membrane (ELM) and ellipsoid zone (EZ) appeared continuous in 69% (29/42) eyes (24 cavity/transition and 5 BALAD lamellar-hole, P = 0.006) and 54.8% (23/42) eyes (20 cavity/transition and 3 BALAD lamellar-hole, P = 0.004), respectively. Accordingly, BCVA was worse in the eyes with BALAD-lamellar hole than in those with cavity/transition BALAD (0.6 ± 0.4 vs. 0.3 ± 0.2; P = 0.01).
conclusionMulticolor imaging is useful to identify BALAD. Cavity and transition BALAD are likely to not progress to FTMH after retinal reattachment. ILM peeling and cover flap prevented FTMH formation in eyes with BALAD-lamellar hole in this cohort. 12 months postoperatively, restoration rates of integrity of ELM and EZ bands and BCVA scores remained lower in eyes with BALAD-lamellar hole in comparison to those with cavity/transition BALAD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42347991What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.