SynthesisClinical oral investigations2026
Temporal dynamics of human biomarkers of orthodontically-induced root resorption: A systematic review.
Synthesis in Clinical oral investigations, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo summarize time-related biomarker changes in orthodontically-induced root resorption (OIRR), classify biomarkers by function, and examine trajectories across OIRR stages. MATERIALS AND
methodsPubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, CENTRAL, CINAHL and grey literature, were searched from inception to October 1, 2025. Reference lists were manually searched. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2 for RCTs and ROBINS-I for non-RCTs. The certainty of evidence was evaluated via GRADE. Because of heterogeneity, findings were synthesized narratively.
resultsFrom 11,434 records, 14 studies (225 participants) were included. Gingival crevicular fluid, saliva and serum were analyzed, mainly using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. RoB was 'moderate'- 'serious' (non-RCTs) or 'some concerns' (RCTs). Studies reported a rise of pro-inflammatory cytokines right after force application. Subsequent force application phases showed signals of osteoclastic activity and regulation, followed by detection of root hard tissue degradation products that correlated with OIRR volume. Higher baseline salivary secretory IgA and anti-dentin humoral responses and lower baseline mineralized-tissue regulators were associated with greater OIRR severity.
conclusionEvidence suggests time-related changes involving early inflammatory activation and later matrix degradation, which may be shaped by interaction between orthodontic force and patients' biological responses. Standardized multicenter prospective cohorts are needed for validation. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Early cytokines changes and later signals of osteoclast regulation and root hard tissue degradation may help define candidate monitoring method for OIRR during treatment. Baseline immune profiles could inform future risk stratification, while bone turnover biomarkers may reflect tooth movement rather than resorption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42347988What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.