ArticlePsychological research2026
The influence of older age, individual differences in cognitive abilities, and state of mind on learning novel categories.
Article in Psychological research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesCategory learning involves learning group items based on similar feature values, and it is a key ability that allows us to acquire new concepts and skills throughout our lives. Yet we know little about the traits and situational factors that facilitate category learning and how those differ in older age. Here, we test the relationship between categorization performance and individual differences in a variety of cognitive abilities and aspects of state of mind and how those relationships differ in older age.
methodSeventy-six young adults (18-29 years old) and 73 older adults (60-83 years old) underwent a cognitive assessment testing processing speed, working memory, verbal comprehension, and perceptual reasoning. Two categorization sessions followed where participants completed a categorization task and state of mind questionnaires assessing stress, motivation, mood, and sleep.
resultsAn individual's cognitive abilities were significant positive predictors of categorization test accuracy. This effect was not moderated by age groups. Most state of mind variables were not significant predictors of categorization test accuracy, except that young adults with negative mood performed worse on the categorization test compared to older adults. DISCUSSION: We show that baseline cognitive abilities influence categorization test accuracy more than state of mind variables regardless of age. Thus, interventions may be most effective when they are designed to work with individual's existing knowledge rather than attempt to directly manipulate transient states of mind.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.