Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42347957›Full record

ArticleBioprocess and biosystems engineering2026

A bioprocessing approach for osteogenic differentiation: combining electrical stimulation with the F1 protein fraction from natural latex of Hevea brasiliensis.

Rafaela Canassa Maiolini, Ana Beatriz do Amaral Oliveira, João Lucas de Oliveira Dantas, Fábio Augusto Bispo Júnior, Guilherme Ferreira Caetano, Ricardo José de Mendonça, Patrícia Soares Santiago

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioprocess and biosystems engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rafaela Canassa MaioliniInstitute of Chemistry, Paulista State University "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" (UNESP), Araraquara, SP, Brazil.
Ana Beatriz do Amaral OliveiraUniversity Center of Hermínio Ometto Fundation (FHO), Araras, SP, Brazil.
João Lucas de Oliveira DantasUniversity Center of Hermínio Ometto Fundation (FHO), Araras, SP, Brazil.
Fábio Augusto Bispo JúniorUniversity Center of Hermínio Ometto Fundation (FHO), Araras, SP, Brazil.
Guilherme Ferreira CaetanoUniversity Center of Hermínio Ometto Fundation (FHO), Araras, SP, Brazil.
Ricardo José de MendonçaDepartment of Biochemistry, Pharmacology and Physiology, Federal University of Triângulo Mineiro (UFTM), Uberaba, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Patrícia Soares SantiagoFaculty of Agricultural Sciences of Vale da Ribeira, Paulista State University "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" (UNESP), Registro, SP, Brazil. patricia.santiago@unesp.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6205-9441

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rising life expectancy and aging of bones have created a demand for new treatments for fractures and bone loss. Tissue engineering and development of scalable bioprocesses are emerging as a promising solution for tissue repair. This study aimed to evaluate in vitro proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) from the bone marrow of Wistar rats subjected to electrical stimulation (ES) and cultured with F1 protein fraction from the latex of the Hevea brasiliensis rubber tree. Additionally, the study aimed to analyze the expression of genes related to osteogenesis. Cell viability (MTT) and osteogenic differentiation (Alizarin red) assays were performed using ES of 60 s, 150 s, and 300 s at 10 μA. The medium was supplemented with F1 at concentrations of 1%, 0.1%, and 0.01%. For gene expression analyses, cells were stimulated for 60 s and 300 s and supplemented with 0.001% and 0.0001% F1. All experimental conditions demonstrated cell viability above 70% with no cytotoxicity. Osteogenic differentiation exceeded 80%, with the ES-60 s group combined with 0.0001% F1 showing the highest efficacy. Expression of Bmp2 and Ltype genes increased with 60 s F1-0.001% and 0.0001%. Col1a1 gene expression was higher with F1-0.001% and ES-300 s, while Alp and Runx2 were prominent with F1-0.0001%. Camk2 showed increased expression with F1-0.001% at 60 s and 300 s. F1 protein fraction of latex has a significant biological effect on promoting the proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of MSCs, especially when combined with ES. This highlights its potential as a therapeutic option in regenerative medicine for bone repair.

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationElectric StimulationHeveaLatexMesenchymal Stem CellsOsteogenesisPlant ProteinsAnimalsCell ProliferationRatsRats, WistarLatexPlant ProteinsBone repairElectrical stimulationNatural latexStem cellsTissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID42347957
PMCPMC13379496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.