ArticleGeneral thoracic and cardiovascular surgery2026
Intraoperative mobile CT and virtual-assisted lung mapping for pulmonary nodule localization: workflow characteristics and radiation dosage in a single-center experience.
Article in General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Methodological considerations in comparing intraoperative CT and VAL-MAP workflows.General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesIntraoperative mobile CT (iCT) and virtual-assisted lung mapping (VAL-MAP) are used to localize pulmonary nodules that are difficult to palpate during minimally invasive surgery. Because these techniques differ in workflow structure and timing of image acquisition, their operative time and radiation exposure may differ. We aimed to describe workflow characteristics and radiation exposure associated with newly implemented iCT and to contextualize these findings against our established VAL-MAP practice.
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed 50 consecutive patients who underwent thoracoscopic wedge resection with localization between January 2024 and December 2025. Twenty-four underwent iCT-guided localization using an O-arm system, and 26 underwent VAL-MAP with bronchoscopic dye marking followed by post-mapping CT. Technique selection was based on device availability and surgeon discretion. CT dose metrics and time components related to localization were analyzed.
resultsMedian CT-related dose-length product (DLP) was higher in the iCT group, primarily due to high-definition scans. When performed in standard mode with a limited scan frequency, iCT radiation exposure approximated that of post-VAL-MAP CT. Preparation CT after lateral positioning reduced repeat scans and iCT-related interruption time. Anesthesia and operative times were shorter in the VAL-MAP cohort, reflecting localization outside the operating room. Overall procedural burden appeared modestly different.
conclusionOur single-center retrospective study quantified the total procedural time for VAL-MAP and iCT, finding modest differences in time and radiation exposure. These real-world data aid institutions considering these localization strategies, but do not establish superiority. Definitive comparative conclusions require future prospective evaluations controlling for nodule characteristics and cost.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42347901What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.