Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42347869›Full record

SynthesisPsychological research2026

Effects of transcranial electrical stimulation on face identification and related perceptual processes: a systematic review.

Aline Miranda de Vasconcelos, José Aldecyano Lino Gomes, Paulo Frassinetti Delfino do Nascimento, Géssika Araújo de Melo, Laurent Koessler, Nelson Torro-Alves

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Psychological research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Aline Miranda de VasconcelosCognitive Neuroscience and Behavior Program, Federal University of Paraíba, Cidade Universitária, João Pessoa, Paraíba, 58051-900, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8722-8491
José Aldecyano Lino GomesCognitive Neuroscience and Behavior Program, Federal University of Paraíba, Cidade Universitária, João Pessoa, Paraíba, 58051-900, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-2843-3697
Paulo Frassinetti Delfino do NascimentoCognitive Neuroscience and Behavior Program, Federal University of Paraíba, Cidade Universitária, João Pessoa, Paraíba, 58051-900, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6754-3948
Géssika Araújo de MeloState University of Paraíba, Campina Grande, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2938-7280
Laurent KoesslerUniversité de Lorraine, CNRS, IMoPA, Nancy, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9009-444X
Nelson Torro-AlvesCognitive Neuroscience and Behavior Program, Federal University of Paraíba, Cidade Universitária, João Pessoa, Paraíba, 58051-900, Brazil. nelsontorro@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3678-5762

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Face identification is a core capacity underpinning effective social interaction and communication. Although a growing body of literature has examined the effects of transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) on face identification, findings remain fragmented and lack an integrative synthesis. This systematic review adopted a broad scope, encompassing all published studies on TES and face identification, with the aim of mapping methodological trends and substantive findings, rather than focusing on a specific subtype of intervention or population. We conducted a PRISMA-guided systematic review of TES effects on face identification. From an initial pool of 261 records, 28 studies met the eligibility criteria. Overall, the evidence highlights both the potential and the complexity of using TES to modulate face identification processing. Targeted stimulation of occipital and fusiform regions shows promising effects in some paradigms; however, inconsistent results and notable methodological limitations preclude definitive conclusions. In particular, small, demographically homogeneous samples limit generalizability, while heterogeneity in stimulation parameters, task designs, and outcome measures complicate cross-study comparisons. By underscoring the need for rigorously controlled experiments with greater anatomical precision, especially in clinical populations, this review aims to inform the development of more robust, transparent methodological guidelines and to support future investigations with stronger scientific relevance.

Indexed as

Facial RecognitionTranscranial Direct Current StimulationHumansFace identificationFace recognitionNon-invasive brain stimulationTranscranial electrical stimulation

Identifiers

PMID42347869
PMCPMC13303659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.