ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2026
Prioritisation of assessments, diagnostic classifications, and outcome measures in Perthes disease: a Delphi survey of international health professionals.
Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe aim of this study is to reach consensus and prioritise the most clinically important assessments, diagnostic classifications, and outcome measures by an international panel of experts for Legg-Calve-Perthes disease. MATERIALS AND
methodsA three-round modified e-Delphi survey was conducted between April and May 2025. Participants rated the clinical importance of 14 clinical assessments, 26 radiological assessments, eight diagnostic classifications, and 26 outcome measures identified by a scoping review. Consensus was defined as ≥ 75% agreement. In the final round, items in each category were prioritised for overall condition and by specific age groups (< 6 years, 6-8 years, > 8 years).
resultsThirty-eight health professionals, from nine countries participated in round 1. Thirty-four completed all three rounds, a retention rate of 89.5%. Consensus and prioritisation for clinical use were achieved for 10 clinical assessments, three radiological assessments, three diagnostic classifications, and three outcome measures.
conclusionPaediatric specialists have reached consensus and prioritised methods to evaluate and diagnose Legg-Calve-Perthes disease in clinical practice. These results represent an important step towards improving continuity of care and the foundation for future development of clinical practice guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.