ReviewVaccines2026
Vaccination Against Serogroup B Meningococcal Disease: Current Status and Future Perspectives-A Consensus Document of the World Association for Infectious Diseases and Immunological Disorders (WAidid).
Review in Vaccines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundInvasive meningococcal disease (IMD) remains a rare but severe condition associated with high mortality and a significant risk of long-term sequelae. Despite global vaccination efforts, the epidemiology of
methodsThis consensus document reviews current evidence on MenB epidemiology and the role of the multicomponent meningococcal serogroup B vaccine (4CMenB), with a focus on immunogenicity, strain coverage, real-world effectiveness, and remaining challenges.
resultsProtein-based MenB vaccines have overcome the limitations of polysaccharide approaches, demonstrating robust immunogenicity across age groups. Real-world data confirm substantial vaccine effectiveness, particularly in infant immunization programs and outbreak settings, with significant reductions in disease incidence. For example, in England in the 3 years after vaccine introduction, MenB IMD incidence declined by 75% in immunized infants compared to unvaccinated controls. Adjusted vaccine efficacy was 52.7% after the two-dose primary series and 59.1% following the booster dose, highlighting the contribution of the booster. However, protection is influenced by antigenic variability among circulating strains, resulting in incomplete and geographically variable coverage. In addition, antibody waning over time and the limited impact on nasopharyngeal carriage reduce the potential for long-term and indirect protection. These factors highlight the need to optimize vaccination strategies, including the timing of booster doses, particularly in adolescents, and the role of vaccination in different epidemiological contexts. In this regard, it is not precisely defined whether infants who were immunized in the first year of life need a booster dose in the preschool period, especially in countries with a high incidence of MenB disease. Moreover, it is not established whether and when adolescents who were vaccinated both in infancy and during the preschool period need a booster dose. Economic considerations and variability in national immunization policies further contribute to heterogeneity in vaccine implementation. Emerging evidence suggests possible cross-protection against other meningococcal serogroups and
conclusions4CMenB is an effective tool for preventing MenB IMD, although further studies are needed. Future strategies should prioritize age-targeted boosting and enhanced genomic surveillance to maximize impact.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.