Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42347623›Full record

ReviewVaccines2026

Vaccination Against Serogroup B Meningococcal Disease: Current Status and Future Perspectives-A Consensus Document of the World Association for Infectious Diseases and Immunological Disorders (WAidid).

Susanna Esposito, Nigel Curtis, Ulrich Heininger, Markus Knuf, Shamez Ladhani, Helen Marshall, Federico Martinon-Torres, Marco Safadi, Vana Spoulou, Mohamed K Taha and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Vaccines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Susanna EspositoPediatric Clinic, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4103-2837
Nigel CurtisDepartment of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia.
Ulrich HeiningerDivision of Pediatric Infectious Diseases and Vaccinology, University Children's Hospital Basel (UKBB), Spitalstrasse 33, 4056 Basel, Switzerland.
Markus KnufDepartment of Pediatrics, Worms Clinic, 67550 Worms, Germany.
Shamez LadhaniImmunisation and Countermeasures Division, UK Health Security Agency & St George's, University of London, London SW17 0RE, UK.
Helen MarshallWomen's and Children's Health Network, North Adelaide, SA 5006, Australia.
Federico Martinon-TorresTranslational Pediatrics and Infectious Diseases, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago & Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9023-581X
Marco SafadiDepartment of Pediatrics, Santa Casa de São Paulo School of Medical Sciences, Rua Dr. Cesário Motta Júnior 112, São Paulo 01221-020, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4401-9446
Vana SpoulouFirst Department of Pediatrics, National and Kapodistrian "Agia Sophia" Children's Hospital, Thivon & Papadiamantopoulou, University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0001-5467-0630
Mohamed K TahaNational Reference Center for Meningococci, Institut Pasteur, 75724 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0716-3174
Nicola PrincipiDepartment of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20122 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3468-5568

Funding

World Association for Infectious Diseases and Immunological Disorders WAidid-2026-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInvasive meningococcal disease (IMD) remains a rare but severe condition associated with high mortality and a significant risk of long-term sequelae. Despite global vaccination efforts, the epidemiology of

methodsThis consensus document reviews current evidence on MenB epidemiology and the role of the multicomponent meningococcal serogroup B vaccine (4CMenB), with a focus on immunogenicity, strain coverage, real-world effectiveness, and remaining challenges.

resultsProtein-based MenB vaccines have overcome the limitations of polysaccharide approaches, demonstrating robust immunogenicity across age groups. Real-world data confirm substantial vaccine effectiveness, particularly in infant immunization programs and outbreak settings, with significant reductions in disease incidence. For example, in England in the 3 years after vaccine introduction, MenB IMD incidence declined by 75% in immunized infants compared to unvaccinated controls. Adjusted vaccine efficacy was 52.7% after the two-dose primary series and 59.1% following the booster dose, highlighting the contribution of the booster. However, protection is influenced by antigenic variability among circulating strains, resulting in incomplete and geographically variable coverage. In addition, antibody waning over time and the limited impact on nasopharyngeal carriage reduce the potential for long-term and indirect protection. These factors highlight the need to optimize vaccination strategies, including the timing of booster doses, particularly in adolescents, and the role of vaccination in different epidemiological contexts. In this regard, it is not precisely defined whether infants who were immunized in the first year of life need a booster dose in the preschool period, especially in countries with a high incidence of MenB disease. Moreover, it is not established whether and when adolescents who were vaccinated both in infancy and during the preschool period need a booster dose. Economic considerations and variability in national immunization policies further contribute to heterogeneity in vaccine implementation. Emerging evidence suggests possible cross-protection against other meningococcal serogroups and

conclusions4CMenB is an effective tool for preventing MenB IMD, although further studies are needed. Future strategies should prioritize age-targeted boosting and enhanced genomic surveillance to maximize impact.

Indexed as

4CMenB vaccineimmunization strategiesmeningococcal diseaseNeisseria meningitidisserogroup Bvaccine effectiveness

Identifiers

PMID42347623
PMCPMC13308371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.