Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42347607›Full record

ArticleVaccines2026

How Partisan Policies Can Shape Health Behaviors: Executive Order Proof-of-Vaccine Mandate Bans Increased COVID-19 Vaccinations.

Deena N Brosi, Gregory Tung, Beth M McManus, Srinivas Parinandi, Glen P Mays

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Deena N BrosiDepartment of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5294-1414
Gregory TungDepartment of Health Systems, Management, and Policy, Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.
Beth M McManusDepartment of Health Systems, Management, and Policy, Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2481-0812
Srinivas ParinandiPolitical Science Department, University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309, USA.
Glen P MaysDepartment of Health Systems, Management, and Policy, Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7837-6812

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesCOVID-19 vaccine resistance was detrimental to herd immunity and worsened COVID-19 morbidity and mortality during outbreaks. Despite more evidence showing reactionary behavior among residents exposed to vaccine mandates, little research has been conducted on the effects of state proof-of-vaccine (POV) mandate bans in the United States (US). We sought to investigate the causal effects of POV mandate bans, overall and stratified by policy passage via executive order or state legislature, on first-dose COVID-19 vaccinations.

methodsIn the contiguous US, 21 states enacted POV mandate bans from 8 February 2021-25 October 2021. Using a geographic regression discontinuity design, we selected treatment and control counties within 150 miles of the POV mandate ban state border. The resulting sample was 4612 county-observations and 2466 unique counties. We conducted two-way fixed-effects estimation to compare changes in weekly, first-dose COVID-19 vaccinations among individuals <65 years old before and after POV mandate ban enactment between treatment and control counties.

resultsAmong executive order POV mandate ban counties, we saw an additional increase in weekly, first-dose COVID-19 vaccinations following POV mandate ban enactment when compared to controls. There was an additional 38.2% increase in Weeks 1-2, 40.6% in Weeks 3-4, 41.3% in Weeks 5-6, and 43.9% in Weeks 7-8.

conclusionsWhile seemingly counterintuitive, these findings follow Psychological Reactance Theory. Once the perceived threat to freedom was removed, reactance to COVID-19 vaccinations declined and constituents received the COVID-19 vaccine of their own volition. Future public health efforts should consider potential reactance to mandatory policies and tailor efforts to community values.

Indexed as

COVID-19 vaccination behaviorexpressive function of lawproof-of-vaccine mandate banspsychological reactance theory

Identifiers

PMID42347607
PMCPMC13307828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.