Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42347572›Full record

ArticleVision (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Subtitle Engagement Varies with Audio-Subtitle Language-Script Pairing: Evidence from Hindi-English Bilinguals with an English-Medium Instruction Background.

Inka Romero-Ortells, Manuel Perea, Eva Gutierrez-Sigut, Jon Andoni Duñabeitia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vision (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Inka Romero-OrtellsCentro de Investigación Nebrija en Cognición (CINC), Universidad Nebrija, 28043 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0009-0002-3888-6129
Manuel PereaCentro de Investigación Nebrija en Cognición (CINC), Universidad Nebrija, 28043 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3291-1365
Eva Gutierrez-SigutDepartment of Psychology, University of Essex, Colchester CO4 3SQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6569-2138
Jon Andoni DuñabeitiaCentro de Investigación Nebrija en Cognición (CINC), Universidad Nebrija, 28043 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3312-8559

Funding

Generalitat Valenciana CIAICO/2024/198Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades PID2023-152078NB-I00Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades PID2024-161331NB-I00 (MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Subtitles often attract visual attention even when they are not necessary for comprehension. In the present eye-tracking experiment, we examined whether attention to subtitles in instructional videos varies as a function of audio-subtitle language-script pairing in Hindi-English bilinguals with an English-medium instruction (EMI) background. Native Hindi participants viewed videos in three conditions: English audio with English subtitles (L2-L2), Hindi audio with Hindi subtitles (L1-L1), and English audio with Hindi subtitles (L2-L1). In the L2-L2 condition, gaze was distributed similarly across speakers' faces and subtitles. In contrast, in both Hindi-subtitle formats, viewers allocated more dwell time to the speakers' faces than to the subtitles. Comprehension scores did not differ significantly across conditions. These findings suggest that subtitle engagement among EMI bilinguals is not solely determined by the presence of subtitles but is also modulated by the properties and perceived utility of the written channel. More generally, our results caution against the view that subtitle engagement is uniformly automatic across multilingual instructional settings.

Indexed as

bilingualismEnglish-medium instructioneye-trackinginstructional videolanguage backgroundsubtitling

Identifiers

PMID42347572
PMCPMC13307662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.