ArticlePrenatal diagnosis2026
Prenatal Genetic Testing for Beckwith-Wiedemann Syndrome: Considerations, Challenges and Observations (A Real-World Study).
Article in Prenatal diagnosis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivePrenatal genetic testing for imprinting disorders is rarely requested with the exception of Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome (BWS) which is associated with specific ultrasound findings (e.g., placental mesenchymal dysplasia, omphalocele). However, genetic testing for BWS is challenging as aberrant DNA methylation has to be addressed which often occur as mosaicism. As a growing number of requests for prenatal BWS testing is observed, data from genetic prenatal BWS testing was compiled to delineate its suitability as well as limitations.
methodThree European laboratories compiled the experiences from 646 prenatal samples. The samples were analysed by methylation-specific assays targeting the imprinting centres in 11p15.5, in a sub-cohort CDKN1C was sequenced.
resultsThe overall detection rate for BWS specific molecular disturbances was 9.75%, and the spectrum of alterations reflected that from postnatal BWS cohorts. The rate of failing samples was in total 4.3%, nearly all failures were observed in native samples.
conclusionPrenatal testing for BWS should be considered in pregnancies with ultrasound findings or family history suggestive for BWS. In the majority of tests, evaluable results can be achieved, though mosaicism can never be excluded and therefore false-negative results are possible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.