ArticleMuscles (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Intra-Rater, Inter-Rater, and Test-Retest Reliability of a Laser- and Inclinometer-Based Hip Joint Position Sense Test in Healthy Adults: A Two-Phase Study with Preliminary Reference Values.
Article in Muscles (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hip joint position sense (JPS), a key component of neuromuscular function arising from muscle spindle and periarticular mechanoreceptor input, remains underexplored, with no standardized and reliable clinical protocol available to assess hip proprioception. This study evaluated the intra- and inter-rater reliability of a laser- and inclinometer-based active hip JPS protocol and established preliminary references in healthy adults. A two-phase reliability study was conducted in accordance with GRRAS and COSMIN guidelines: 17 participants for reliability analyses and 57 for preliminary references. Six movement directions were assessed (flexion, extension, abduction, adduction, medial and lateral rotations). Reliability was quantified using intraclass correlation coefficients with their 95% confidence intervals, using two-way random-effects models with absolute agreement (ICC(3,1) for intra-rater and ICC(2,1) for inter-rater analyses), interpreted as poor (<0.50), moderate (0.50-0.70), or good (≥0.70). Absolute measurement error was reported as standard error of measurement (SEM%) and 95% minimal detectable change (MDC95%), normalized to target amplitudes to allow direct cross-direction comparison. Intra-rater reliability ranged from poor to moderate, with experienced raters reaching ICC = 0.64 (95% CI [0.39; 0.80]) for medial rotation. Inter-rater reliability improved across sessions, peaking for medial rotation (ICC = 0.78; 95% CI [0.50; 0.91]). Rotational movements yielded the lowest SEM% (3-6%), indicating high measurement precision despite trial-to-trial variability (MDC% 9-31%). Normative errors were largest in flexion (21.4 cm) and smallest in rotations (≈2.2-2.3°). Despite overall low-to-moderate reliability, the protocol achieved clinically acceptable measurement precision (SEM% < 10%) for rotational tasks, whereas the laser-based sagittal and frontal-plane components remained exploratory. The protocol provides preliminary reference values for hip JPS in healthy adults and requires further validation before clinical use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.