ReviewMuscles (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Structural and Functional Principles in Quadriceps Reconstruction.
Review in Muscles (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Quadriceps muscle and tendon injuries are a significant cause of impairment of the knee extensor mechanism, ranging from minor muscle strains to complete tendon ruptures and extensive defects following oncologic resections. This narrative review provides a comprehensive analysis of contemporary concepts in anatomy, biomechanics, diagnosis, surgical management, and rehabilitation, with a particular focus on reconstructive techniques and functional outcomes. While most muscle injuries respond well to conservative management, complete quadriceps tendon ruptures typically require surgical repair to restore extensor continuity. Both transosseous suture techniques and suture anchor fixation demonstrate reliable outcomes, with no clear superiority in clinical results. Chronic ruptures present additional challenges due to tendon retraction and poor tissue quality, often necessitating advanced reconstruction methods such as V-Y tendon lengthening and augmentation with autografts, allografts, or synthetic materials. In cases of large defects, especially following soft-tissue sarcoma resection, free functional muscle transfer (FFMT) has emerged as a key reconstructive strategy. Common donor muscles include the latissimus dorsi, gracilis, rectus abdominis, and vastus lateralis, each offering specific biomechanical advantages. Functional recovery is strongly influenced by the extent of quadriceps preservation, with better outcomes observed when at least two muscle heads remain functional. Rehabilitation protocols vary depending on the surgical approach. Early controlled mobilisation is generally recommended after tendon repair, whereas FFMT requires a more cautious and prolonged rehabilitation process to allow for flap integration and reinnervation. Overall, optimal outcomes depend on a multidisciplinary approach combining appropriate surgical technique, individualized rehabilitation, and careful patient selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.