ArticleNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Influence of Device Structure and Manufacturing Thermal Budget on Channel Release Module in GAA NSFET and Process Optimization.
Article in Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In logic device development, gate-all-around nanosheet field-effect transistors (GAA NSFETs) are widely regarded as the future mainstream architecture. Due to an innovative stacked-channel design, a novel process module of channel release has been introduced, posing significant challenges to device manufacturing. The channel release quality plays a decisive role in the device's turn-on voltage and operating speed. Meanwhile, the complex interferences are undoubtedly brought by diverse structures and manufacturing thermal budgets of GAA NSFETs. Here, the non-plasma gas etching, which is not yet widely used in the current industry, is adopted for channel release. The influences of nanosheet width, spacing, and annealing conditions on the etching process are systematically studied. A SiGe/Si etching selectivity as high as 87 is achieved. With increasing channel width, a downward trend in the single-sided damage in the central region of Si nanosheets is shown. At >100% over-etching, the Si single-sided damage in structures with different channel spacing is controlled below 1 nm. The intensified diffusion of Ge elements in the SiGe layer and a gradual slowdown of the SiGe etching rate are caused by increasing the annealing temperature. The root mean square (RMS) value of the channel surface roughness is reduced from 0.087 to 0.069 nm by adding the *H radical pretreatment into the process. These findings provide valuable guidance for developing a channel release etching process with high selectivity, low damage, a stable process window, and low fabrication difficulty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.