Anti-

Eşe Aslan Başbulut, Demet Yavuz, Tülin Demir

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Eşe Aslan BaşbulutDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Samsun Training and Research Hospital, Health Science University, Samsun 55090, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0001-8235-9524

Demet YavuzDepartment of Nephrology, Faculty of Medicine, Samsun University, Samsun 55090, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-4082-6320

Tülin DemirDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Ahi Evran University, Kirsehir 40100, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLyme borreliosis is a multisystemic tick-borne infection caused by

methodsThe study included 45 patients and 45 age and sex matched controls. Serum samples were tested for anti-

resultsOverall, anti-

conclusionsIgG seropositivity was numerically higher among patients with CKD of unknown etiology than among healthy controls; however, this difference was not statistically significant. Larger, risk-factor-adjusted studies are needed to clarify whether

Indexed as

Antibodies, BacterialBorrelia burgdorferiChronic Kidney Diseases of Uncertain EtiologyImmunoglobulin GLyme DiseaseRenal DialysisAdultAgedAnimalsBlotting, WesternCase-Control StudiesEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedAntibodies, BacterialImmunoglobulin GBorrelia burgdorferichronic kidney diseasechronic renal failureLyme borreliosisseroprevalenceWestern blot

Identifiers

PMID42347267

DOI10.3390/pathogens15060655

PMCPMC13304977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.