ArticleTomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.)2026
Ultrasonographic Assessment of Hepatic Capsular Thickness in Fitz-Hugh-Curtis Syndrome: Correlation with Computed Tomography.
Article in Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo investigate whether hepatic capsular thickness (HCT) measured on ultrasonography (US) is associated with HCT measured on arterial-phase computed tomography (CT), and to evaluate the potential discriminative performance of US-measured HCT in women with Fitz-Hugh-Curtis syndrome (FHCS).
methodsIn this retrospective dual-center case-control study, 17 women with clinically diagnosed FHCS who underwent both arterial-phase CT and abdominal US within a 3-day interval were included. Thirty-five healthy women served as controls. HCT was measured on CT and US by two abdominal radiologists blinded to clinical information. HCT values were compared between groups, the association between CT and US measurements was assessed, interobserver agreement was evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to explore candidate cutoff values for discriminating FHCS from controls.
resultsMedian HCT on CT was significantly greater in the FHCS group than in the control group [1.80 mm (IQR, 1.60-2.00) vs. 0.60 mm (IQR, 0.40-0.70);
conclusionsUS-measured HCT was significantly increased in women with clinically diagnosed FHCS and showed a significant positive correlation of moderate strength with CT-measured HCT. These findings suggest that US-based HCT assessment may provide supportive imaging information in patients with suspected FHCS. Further validation in larger cohorts, particularly in clinically relevant control populations, is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.