ArticlePharmacy (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Tailoring the CFIR to Medication Adherence Interventions: A Delphi and Living Lab Study.
Article in Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The implementation of medication adherence interventions is suboptimal. To guide implementation, this study aimed to tailor an existing implementation determinant framework to support the assessment of the implementability of such interventions in a specific context prior to implementation, and to investigate whether experts can assess in advance which determinants are important for implementing medication adherence interventions. In a Delphi study, experts rated determinants based on constructs of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) in terms of their importance for implementing medication adherence interventions. Determinants were then prospectively evaluated in four Dutch living labs implementing medication adherence interventions. The results were compared to assess agreement between expert opinion and real-world practice. Of 40 evaluated CFIR determinants, 16 were important in the majority of the living labs. These determinants concerned the inner setting, characteristics and roles of involved individuals, and implementation process domains of the CFIR. After comparing the prospective evaluation with Delphi results, expert opinions matched living lab observations for 18 out of 40 determinants (45%) regarding (un)importance. The CFIR was tailored to primary care medication adherence interventions based on practice observations, offering a potentially helpful framework to assess implementability of these interventions in specific contexts in advance. Determinant frameworks could benefit from incorporating real-world practice data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.