Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42347058›Full record

ArticlePharmacy (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Through the Lens of Expanded Scope of Practice: Training Requirements for Pharmacist-Prescribed Contraception Across the United States.

Taylor Clark, Ioana Sandru, Samantha Kunkel, Sarah Lynch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Taylor ClarkDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, Binghamton University School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Binghamton, NY 13905, USA.
Ioana SandruDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, Binghamton University School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Binghamton, NY 13905, USA.
Samantha KunkelGeisinger Health System, Danville, PA 17822, USA.
Sarah LynchDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, Binghamton University School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Binghamton, NY 13905, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Thirty-one U.S. states and the District of Columbia currently authorize pharmacists to prescribe hormonal contraception. Expansion of pharmacist scope of practice into areas such as contraceptive prescribing represents an extension beyond traditional baseline licensure authority. As a result, jurisdictions frequently require additional training to address competency, patient safety, and liability considerations. Because regulation of pharmacy practice occurs at the state level, training requirements vary across jurisdictions. State boards of pharmacy websites and publicly available regulatory materials were reviewed to identify training requirements for pharmacists authorized to prescribe hormonal contraception. Relevant statutes, regulations, and prescribing protocols were examined. Identified requirements were extracted and categorized into thematic groupings based on the level and type of training specified. Most jurisdictions require pharmacists to complete training beyond standard pharmacy education prior to prescribing hormonal contraception. Such requirements are characteristic of newly expanded scope-of-practice authorities, where regulators seek to verify competency and mitigate liability risk. As prescribing activities become more fully incorporated into pharmacy practice acts and professional education, separate training requirements may diminish over time.

Indexed as

contraceptive prescribingpharmacist prescribed contraceptives

Identifiers

PMID42347058
PMCPMC13306993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.