Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42347045›Full record

ArticleMethods and protocols2026

Design, Preparation and Characterization of Nationally Representative Synthetic Food Waste for Reproducible Waste Valorization Research.

Ryan Scott Anderson, Sybil Sharvelle, Susan K De Long

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Methods and protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ryan Scott AndersonDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7572-1668
Sybil SharvelleDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.
Susan K De LongDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3160-2392

Funding

Advanced Research Projects Agency - Energy ARPA-E 21/CJ000/07/06
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Food waste is a readily digestible and fermentable feedstock for waste to energy bioprocesses. Approximately one third of food is wasted, thus making improvements in food waste valorization is essential for a circular economy. Laboratory results must be reproducible and as representative of scaled performance as possible to facilitate knowledge sharing between research groups. Food waste used in laboratory studies is often collected in situ or overly simplistic synthetic mixtures are used. Food waste collected in situ from any one local source at a single time point (e.g., grab samples from a cafeteria or restaurant) are not reproducible or nationally representative; additionally, overly simple synthetic mixtures are reproducible, but lack the complexity of real food waste and are not nationally representative. Thus, an adequately complex, reproducible, and nationally representative food waste recipe is needed to standardize the feedstocks used in laboratory scale food waste digestion and fermentation studies. In this work, we developed a food waste recipe made from widely and commercially available ingredients which is based on national-scale food wastage data in the United States. The nationally representative food waste mixture was 45.4% carbohydrates, 32.5% lipids, and 13.4% proteins. The biomethane potential was 495 ± 44 mL CH

Indexed as

circular economydigestionfood wasteresource recoveryvalorization

Identifiers

PMID42347045
PMCPMC13304604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.