ReviewPathophysiology : the official journal of the International Society for Pathophysiology2026
Mechanistic Insights into the Role of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in the Diagnosis and Management of Multiple Sclerosis.
Review in Pathophysiology : the official journal of the International Society for Pathophysiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic, immune-mediated demyelinating disease of the central nervous system whose heterogeneous clinical, radiological, and biological course has long resisted precise individual-level prediction. The recent convergence of large longitudinal datasets, advanced computational methods, and increasingly informative biomarkers has created conditions in which artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) can begin to address that problem substantively. This review surveys the current evidence for AI/ML applications across the MS care continuum, with particular focus on the literature from 2022 through early 2026. Nine domains are examined: automated MRI lesion segmentation and quantification, fluid biomarker interpretation, unsupervised disease subtyping, disability progression prediction, treatment response stratification, drug repurposing and molecular discovery, digital biomarker monitoring, mechanistic interpretability, and integrated clinical management protocols. Notable recent contributions include the SuStaIn-based identification of two biologically distinct MS trajectories distinguished by early versus late serum neurofilament light chain elevation, the MindGlide deep learning platform enabling longitudinal analysis of archived routine clinical MRI data, the T-cell morphological classifier predicting natalizumab treatment response before drug initiation, and the fenebrutinib Phase III program that produced the first Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor results meeting primary endpoints in both relapsing and primary progressive MS. A proposed AI-Enhanced Management Protocol (AMP-26) reflecting 2026 clinical standards is included as an appendix. Throughout, emphasis is placed on mechanistic interpretability: the distinction between models that correlate features with outcomes and models whose decision logic reflects established MS pathobiology is considered a prerequisite for clinical credibility and regulatory readiness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.