Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42346953›Full record

ArticleMembranes2026

Inorganic Scaling Mechanisms During Forward Osmosis Concentration of Fresh vs. Hydrolysed Urine: Theoretical Modelling and Experimental Validation.

Maano Tshimange, Ṋamadzavho Enos Sitabule, Judy Lee, Siddharth Gadkari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Membranes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Maano TshimangeSchool of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XH, Surrey, UK.
Ṋamadzavho Enos SitabuleSasol Research & Technology, Sasolburg 1947, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-3762-1199
Judy LeeSchool of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XH, Surrey, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5808-2983
Siddharth GadkariSchool of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XH, Surrey, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5228-8534

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Forward osmosis (FO) offers a promising route for urine concentration and nutrient recovery, yet inorganic scaling under high water recovery remains a significant challenge. This study systematically investigated scaling during FO treatment of synthetic fresh urine (SFU) and synthetic hydrolysed urine (SHU) over three consecutive cycles to 80% water recovery. SFU exhibited moderate flux decline (~14.4 → 4-5 LMH), with minimal hydraulic resistance from sparse calcium-deficient Ca-P deposits (Ca:P ≈ 1.2; ACP/OCP-like). In contrast, SHU caused severe cumulative scaling, progressively reducing flux from 19 → 14.46 → 1.3 LMH, dominated by struvite (Mg:P ≈ 1.02) and mixed Mg-carbonate phases. Visual MINTEQ thermodynamic modelling correctly identified the dominant mineral families in both feeds, while kinetic effects governed the formation of metastable phases, demonstrating that equilibrium modelling and experimental characterisation are complementary tools for scaling prediction under transient FO conditions. Physical cleaning restored ~98-99% of water flux for both feeds, confirming that even severe SHU-induced scaling is largely hydraulically reversible. High rejection of multivalent ions (PO

Indexed as

forward osmosisinorganic scalingscaling reversibilitythermodynamic modellingurine

Identifiers

PMID42346953
PMCPMC13303410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.