ArticleJournal of imaging2026
Radiomics-Guided Multi-Sequence Learning for Pathological Complete Response Prediction from Breast MRI with Missing Auxiliary Sequences.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) provides an endpoint for treatment evaluation in breast cancer. Multi-sequence breast MRI can support pCR prediction, but routine examinations may lack usable T1-weighted or T2-weighted sequences. Many models merge radiomic and deep features by concatenation, leaving the interaction between handcrafted descriptors and learned representations weakly specified. We developed a radiomics-guided framework for pCR prediction from multi-sequence breast MRI. The model uses a multi-branch 2.5D encoder for sequence-specific features, radiomics-guided channel recalibration, and masked token fusion to aggregate available sequence tokens. We evaluated the framework on 157 patients from the I-SPY1 Trial cohort with patient-level five-fold cross-validation, fixed sequence-combination analysis, and slice-window sensitivity analysis. The full model achieved 78.4% accuracy and 0.809 AUC, compared with 75.8% accuracy and 0.788 AUC for the strongest channel-concatenation baseline. In this cohort, radiomics-guided multi-sequence learning was feasible, with external validation required before clinical interpretation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.