ArticleJournal of imaging2026
Hyperspectral Fingerprints of Abdominal and Pelvic Organs.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ovarian cancer (OC) is typically treated with cytoreductive surgery (CRS). Hyperspectral imaging (HSI) is an emerging non-invasive, label-free technique that enables whole-area scanning, making it a promising tool for real-time tumour recognition. However, developing tumour recognition algorithms requires a foundational understanding of spectral variability in normal tissues. This study focusses on the in vivo spectral profiles of key abdominal and pelvic organs encountered during CRS, including the uterus, ovaries, intestines, mesentery, omentum, peritoneum, and fallopian tubes, and evaluates the potential for organ recognition using HSI data. Intraoperative HSI data were from healthy patients. Two machine learning models, a support vector machine (SVM) and a 3D convolutional neural network (3DCNN), were trained to classify the organs based on their spectral signatures. In total, 15 patients were included in the dataset. The 3DCNN slightly outperformed the SVM in terms of the average accuracy (0.889 vs. 0.878), sensitivity (0.648 vs. 0.604), specificity (0.936 vs. 0.930), and Dice Similarity Coefficient (0.595 vs. 0.569). This study demonstrates the feasibility of using HSI for organ differentiation in the clinical setting, although in some cases separability remains a challenge, especially when organs have similar spectra. This is a critical step towards a generalizable in vivo abdominal tumour recognition algorithm, by carefully investigating spectral fingerprints of abdominal tissues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.