ArticleJournal of imaging2026
Edge-Enhance YOLO for Steel Surface Defect Detection.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Surface defect detection is an important task for quality assurance in steel manufacturing. Although YOLO-style detectors are widely used due to their strong performance, they often struggle to accurately localize edge-dominant defects such as crazing and fine cracks. This limitation arises because such defects exhibit weak feature representations. In addition, their high-frequency structural details are progressively degraded during repeated downsampling. To address this issue, a YOLO-based detection framework named EDEN-YOLO is proposed. It incorporates an in-place Edge-Enhance module into the YOLOv8 baseline to improve structural sensitivity. Specifically, a Local Feature Enhancement (LFE) module is designed to capture edge-sensitive patterns. A Gated Module is further introduced to perform spatially selective recalibration of backbone features. This design enhances edge responses while suppressing noise. Experiments on the NEU-DET benchmark demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method. EDEN-YOLO achieves 80.5% mAP@0.5 on NEU-DET, showing an improvement over the reproduced YOLOv8 baseline while introducing a moderate increase in model complexity by 0.52M parameters and 1.3 GFLOPs. A supplementary evaluation on the GC10-DET dataset shows that EDEN-YOLO achieves 65.2% mAP@0.5, compared with 61.0% for the reproduced YOLOv8 baseline. The qualitative results show that the proposed module produces more compact feature responses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.