Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42346921›Full record

ReviewJournal of imaging2026

Multi-Task and Federated Learning for Breast and Lung Cancer Screening and Diagnosis: A Survey and Future Research Directions.

Alexandru Ciobotaru, Cosmina Corches, Dan Gota, Liviu Miclea

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alexandru CiobotaruAutomation Department, Faculty of Automation and Computer Science, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, 400114 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.ORCID 0009-0007-6702-0961
Cosmina CorchesAutomation Department, Faculty of Automation and Computer Science, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, 400114 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-0808-5032
Dan GotaAutomation Department, Faculty of Automation and Computer Science, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, 400114 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-4152-7469
Liviu MicleaAutomation Department, Faculty of Automation and Computer Science, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, 400114 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-3377-7898

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreast cancer (BrC) and lung cancer (LuC) are two forms of aggressive cancer that affect both men and women worldwide. Recently, multitask learning (MTL) and federated learning (FL) techniques have proven to be efficient in increasing the robustness of deep learning (DL)-based models by performing multiple tasks simultaneously and preserving the confidentiality of medical data.

methodsThis paper presents a survey of MTL and FL methods for BrC and LuC screening and diagnosis using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology. Comprehensive tables were created to highlight the performances of both MTL models and FL environments.

resultsThe main challenges identified were the lack of hybrid MTL models that combine hard and soft sharing, heterogeneous imaging data, and edge FL systems.

conclusionsFL environments obtain competitive performance compared with centralized MTL models, highlighting their potential to preserve medical data confidentiality without compromising performance. Future research directions could include MTL-based models incorporated in FL environments, hybrid MTL models that combine both hard- and soft-sharing parameter methods, and the use of blockchain techniques to increase the security of FL environments.

Indexed as

breast cancerdeep learningfederated learninglung cancermedical image analysismulti-task learning

Identifiers

PMID42346921
PMCPMC13301048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.