ReviewJournal of imaging2026
Multi-Task and Federated Learning for Breast and Lung Cancer Screening and Diagnosis: A Survey and Future Research Directions.
Review in Journal of imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBreast cancer (BrC) and lung cancer (LuC) are two forms of aggressive cancer that affect both men and women worldwide. Recently, multitask learning (MTL) and federated learning (FL) techniques have proven to be efficient in increasing the robustness of deep learning (DL)-based models by performing multiple tasks simultaneously and preserving the confidentiality of medical data.
methodsThis paper presents a survey of MTL and FL methods for BrC and LuC screening and diagnosis using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology. Comprehensive tables were created to highlight the performances of both MTL models and FL environments.
resultsThe main challenges identified were the lack of hybrid MTL models that combine hard and soft sharing, heterogeneous imaging data, and edge FL systems.
conclusionsFL environments obtain competitive performance compared with centralized MTL models, highlighting their potential to preserve medical data confidentiality without compromising performance. Future research directions could include MTL-based models incorporated in FL environments, hybrid MTL models that combine both hard- and soft-sharing parameter methods, and the use of blockchain techniques to increase the security of FL environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.