Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42346908›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging2026

Exposure-Aware Training for Low-Light Object Detection Without Target-Domain Data.

Yawen Su, Min Lu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yawen SuSchool of Intelligence Science and Technology, Inner Mongolia University of Technology, Hohhot 010080, China.ORCID 0009-0009-8847-6604
Min LuSchool of Intelligence Science and Technology, Inner Mongolia University of Technology, Hohhot 010080, China.

Funding

the Inner Mongolia Natural Science Foundation 2024MS06009the Inner Mongolia Natural Science Foundation 2025MS06039the Inner Mongolia Natural Science Foundation 2025QN06005the Inner Mongolia University of Technology Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Program 2025026008the Key Research and Development Program of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region 2025YFHH0083the Key Research and Development Program of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region 2025YFHH0115
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Low-light object detection remains challenging because insufficient illumination obscures visual features and increases the discrepancy between training and testing conditions. Existing approaches often rely on detector redesign, image enhancement, or target-domain data, which may introduce additional complexity during training or inference. This paper presents Exposure-Aware Training (EAT), a lightweight degradation-based training strategy that applies illumination attenuation and additive Gaussian noise to normal-light images during training. The degradation parameters are estimated from real low-light image pairs, while the detector architecture remains unchanged. Our experimental results show that moderate degradation consistently improves low-light detection performance, whereas excessively strong degradation may damage semantic information, especially for small objects. Under both cross-domain and mixed-training settings, EAT achieves stable improvements on YOLOv8 and Faster R-CNN, with more noticeable gains for illumination-sensitive categories. These results indicate that exposing detectors to task-oriented illumination degradation during training can effectively improve low-light detection performance without additional inference overhead.

Indexed as

domain generalizationexposure-aware traininglow-light object detectionsynthetic degradationzero-inference adaptation

Identifiers

PMID42346908
PMCPMC13301306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.